Model · compound growth · decide yourself

Penny doubled · 31 generations

Same caret (^) as the Ham/Nye population catch: compound growth, not simple interest.

Start with one penny. Double it every day. That is v = 2^(d−1) cents on day d. Day 31 is not “31 pennies plus interest” — it is about $10.7 million.

A penny doubled · 31 days (log scale) d1d516¢d10$5d15$164d20$5,243d25$167,772d28$1,342,177d31$10,737,418 Day 31 = 2^30 cents ≈ $10.7 million · same ^ as population doubling

Figure 1. Classic penny-doubled series · log-scaled bars so day 31 remains visible.

Same math · people

If a population model doubles every generation for 31 generations, headcount scales like 2^g. Generation 31 ≈ 2.15 billion in the pure doubling toy model. This is a potentiality sketch — not a claim that history was pure doubling with no death, famine, or migration.

Population if doubled each generation (log) g0g5g10g15g20g25g30g31 Generation 31 ≈ 2^31 ≈ 2.15 billion people · model only · not history

Figure 2. Toy population doubling to generation 31 (log scale).

What about 5 million years of people?

At 25 years/generation, 5,000,000 years ≈ 200,000 generations. A pure-doubling model across that span is not a sober demographic history — it is a reductio on treating deep time + continuous people as if growth were unconstrained compound interest. We show the scale; you decide what potentiality you accept.

Potentiality check · 5 million years of people (log count) 33Doublings to ~8B3131-gen model200,0005 Myr ÷ 25y/gen You decide: continuous doubling for 200k gens is not a serious demographic model — potentiality ≠ necessity.

Figure 3. Doublings needed for ~8B vs generations inside 5 Myr (log counts).

Bias stated: we lean toward God and responsible reading of math. We do not require flat-earth ideas. Potentiality ≠ proof. See also Ham/Nye caret note and Theorem G.

Defend Your Sins · biased toward God · responsible · no flat-earth theater · cite academics · decide yourself